🔗 Share this article

Worldwide, states are pouring enormous sums into what's termed “sovereign AI” – building domestic machine learning technologies. From the city-state of Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, nations are racing to create AI that grasps local languages and cultural nuances.

The International AI Arms Race

This movement is part of a broader international contest led by large firms from the US and the People's Republic of China. Whereas organizations like a leading AI firm and a social media giant allocate substantial funds, middle powers are additionally placing sovereign bets in the artificial intelligence domain.

However with such tremendous sums at stake, is it possible for less wealthy countries secure meaningful gains? As stated by a analyst from an influential research institute, “Unless you’re a rich government or a major firm, it’s quite a challenge to develop an LLM from scratch.”

Security Concerns

Many countries are unwilling to rely on foreign AI models. In India, as an example, Western-developed AI solutions have at times been insufficient. One example saw an AI tool used to instruct students in a isolated community – it spoke in English with a pronounced American accent that was nearly-incomprehensible for local students.

Then there’s the defence aspect. For the Indian military authorities, using particular external AI tools is seen as not permissible. As one entrepreneur explained, “It could have some unvetted data source that may state that, for example, a certain region is separate from India … Employing that certain model in a defence setup is a big no-no.”

He further stated, “I have spoken to people who are in the military. They want to use AI, but, forget about specific systems, they don’t even want to rely on Western systems because data may be transferred abroad, and that is totally inappropriate with them.”

Homegrown Initiatives

In response, a number of countries are funding national ventures. An example such a effort is being developed in India, wherein a company is working to build a sovereign LLM with state funding. This project has allocated roughly $1.25bn to machine learning progress.

The expert envisions a system that is more compact than leading tools from US and Chinese firms. He states that the country will have to compensate for the resource shortfall with skill. Based in India, we don’t have the luxury of investing massive funds into it,” he says. “How do we vie with say the hundreds of billions that the United States is pumping in? I think that is where the fundamental knowledge and the brain game comes in.”

Local Priority

In Singapore, a government initiative is supporting AI systems developed in south-east Asia’s local dialects. Such languages – for example the Malay language, the Thai language, the Lao language, Bahasa Indonesia, Khmer and more – are commonly inadequately covered in Western-developed LLMs.

It is my desire that the people who are developing these independent AI models were conscious of just how far and just how fast the leading edge is advancing.

An executive involved in the initiative notes that these models are designed to supplement larger AI, as opposed to displacing them. Tools such as ChatGPT and another major AI system, he states, commonly struggle with regional languages and cultural aspects – interacting in stilted the Khmer language, for example, or suggesting meat-containing dishes to Malay individuals.

Creating regional-language LLMs enables local governments to code in local context – and at least be “smart consumers” of a sophisticated technology built in other countries.

He continues, I am cautious with the concept independent. I think what we’re aiming to convey is we wish to be better represented and we want to grasp the features” of AI systems.

International Partnership

Regarding countries attempting to establish a position in an escalating international arena, there’s another possibility: join forces. Researchers connected to a respected policy school put forward a state-owned AI venture distributed among a group of emerging countries.

They call the project “an AI equivalent of Airbus”, in reference to Europe’s effective strategy to develop a competitor to Boeing in the mid-20th century. Their proposal would see the creation of a government-supported AI organization that would combine the capabilities of various states’ AI initiatives – including the UK, Spain, the Canadian government, the Federal Republic of Germany, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, the French Republic, Switzerland and Sweden – to create a competitive rival to the US and Chinese leaders.

The main proponent of a paper setting out the concept states that the concept has gained the consideration of AI officials of at least several countries to date, as well as multiple sovereign AI companies. While it is presently centered on “middle powers”, emerging economies – Mongolia and the Republic of Rwanda among them – have likewise shown curiosity.

He comments, “Nowadays, I think it’s an accepted truth there’s less trust in the assurances of the existing White House. Experts are questioning such as, is it safe to rely on these technologies? Suppose they decide to